Philippe Clement’s complaints following a

Philippe Clement complaints unanimously rejected after controversial Rangers incident

controversial handball incident during Rangers’ match against Hibernian were unanimously rejected by the SFA’s key panel. The panel reviewed the decision that resulted in a penalty against John Souttar, ruling 5-0 in favor of the referee’s initial call. Clement had been frustrated with the penalty awarded, which he believed was unjust, leading him to call for an explanation regarding the decision. However, his protest was dismissed, leaving the decision upheld【8†source】. Philippe Clement’s complaints following a controversial handball incident during Rangers’ match against Hibernian were unanimously rejected by the SFA’s key panel. The panel reviewed the decision that resulted in a penalty against John Souttar, ruling 5-0 in favor of the referee’s initial call. Clement had been frustrated with the penalty awarded, which he believed was unjust, leading him to call for an explanation regarding the decision. However, his protest was dismissed, leaving the decision upheld【8†source】.Philippe Clement’s complaints following a controversial handball incident during Rangers’ match against Hibernian were unanimously rejected by the SFA’s key panel. The panel reviewed the decision that resulted in a penalty against John Souttar, ruling 5-0 in favor of the referee’s initial call. Clement had been frustrated with the penalty awarded, which he believed was unjust, leading him to call for an explanation regarding the decision. However, his protest was dismissed, leaving the decision upheld【8†source】.Philippe Clement’s complaints following a controversial handball incident during Rangers’ match against Hibernian were unanimously rejected by the SFA’s key panel. The panel reviewed the decision that

Philippe Clement complaints unanimously rejected after controversial Rangers incident

resulted in a penalty against John Souttar, ruling 5-0 in favor of the referee’s initial call. Clement had been frustrated with the penalty awarded, which he believed was unjust, leading him to call for an explanation regarding the decision. However, his protest was dismissed, leaving the decision upheld【8†source】.