Tom Selleck, the Emmy-winning actor renowned for his roles in Magnum P.I. and Blue Bloods, has faced significant backlash for his involvement in promoting reverse mortgages through American Advisors Group (AAG). His endorsement has sparked controversy, particularly among consumer advocacy groups and regulatory bodies, who argue that such advertisements may mislead vulnerable seniors.

The Role of Tom Selleck in AAG’s Campaign
In 2016, AAG appointed Selleck as its national spokesperson, aiming to leverage his widespread recognition and trustworthiness to educate older Americans about reverse mortgages. The company emphasized that Selleck’s involvement was intended to demystify the product and highlight its potential benefits for seniors seeking financial stability in retirement
Regulatory Concerns and Penalties
Despite AAG’s intentions, regulatory agencies have raised alarms about the company’s advertising practices. In 2021, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) filed a complaint against AAG, alleging that the company used inflated and deceptive home estimates to lure consumers into taking out reverse mortgages. The CFPB proposed a $1.1 million penalty and mandated that AAG cease misrepresenting estimated home values to consumers
Earlier, in 2015, the CFPB had warned that many reverse mortgage ads, including those featuring celebrities like Selleck, failed to adequately disclose the risks associated with such loans. The agency found that these advertisements often left seniors with the false impression that reverse mortgages were government benefits that guaranteed they could stay in their homes for life, without highlighting the potential for foreclosure if property taxes or insurance were not maintained
Public Perception and Media Critique

The controversy surrounding Selleck’s endorsement has also been reflected in popular media. In 2023, the animated series Family Guy satirized Selleck’s reverse mortgage advertisements. The episode depicted the show’s protagonist, Peter Griffin, being misled by a reverse mortgage ad featuring Selleck, leading to financial difficulties and potential foreclosure. This portrayal underscores the public’s skepticism regarding the messaging in such advertisements
Conclusion

While Tom Selleck’s involvement with AAG was intended to provide clarity and credibility to the reverse mortgage product, the subsequent regulatory scrutiny and public criticism highlight the complexities and potential pitfalls associated with such financial products. The backlash serves as a reminder of the importance of transparency and responsibility in advertising, especially when targeting vulnerable populations like senior homeowners.